Comments on: Daily, Monthly And Weekly Tests Of GMDSS Equipment On Board Ships https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships The Maritime Industry Guide Mon, 04 Mar 2024 05:40:58 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 By: Mostafa Reda https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships/#comment-4760965 Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:09:03 +0000 https://www.marineinsight.com/?p=164563#comment-4760965 What is your source, you should write it

]]>
By: Bodh Bhattarai https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships/#comment-4754869 Tue, 05 Jan 2021 06:28:03 +0000 https://www.marineinsight.com/?p=164563#comment-4754869 Very informative just want make correction in monthly test of INMARSAT satc unit monthly actual line test to be done with LES not performance test that is done in weekly test. Actual test you send message to LES with code 91. LES will send the confirmation and delivered message.

]]>
By: Anish https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships/#comment-4736330 Sun, 19 Jul 2020 04:41:06 +0000 https://www.marineinsight.com/?p=164563#comment-4736330 In reply to AWANISH SINGH.

@Awanish: Thank you for your comment.

]]>
By: AWANISH SINGH https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships/#comment-4736296 Fri, 17 Jul 2020 03:52:20 +0000 https://www.marineinsight.com/?p=164563#comment-4736296 Thank you for this refreshment. Really nice article.

]]>
By: Anish https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships/#comment-4736024 Mon, 29 Jun 2020 06:11:35 +0000 https://www.marineinsight.com/?p=164563#comment-4736024 In reply to Christian Nielsen.

Please do check with the maker as it seems to be the problem of settings.

]]>
By: Christian Nielsen https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships/#comment-4735297 Tue, 05 May 2020 02:40:05 +0000 https://www.marineinsight.com/?p=164563#comment-4735297 Hi.
I do not receive acknowledgement on MF/HF when I send a test message to a coast station or ship station.
The ship station received my test message and ack it but I did not received the ack.
Afterwards ship station sent me a test message and I received it and ack it and the other ship received my ack.
So what seems to be the problem. Why do I not receive the acknowledgement?

]]>
By: Vlad https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships/#comment-4734893 Sun, 29 Mar 2020 12:57:07 +0000 https://www.marineinsight.com/?p=164563#comment-4734893 It will be nice if you provide more reliable sources instead of your own experience. All equipment should be tested according SOLAS requirements and other documents.

]]>
By: daniel https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships/#comment-4733328 Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:49:46 +0000 https://www.marineinsight.com/?p=164563#comment-4733328 Answer for Jim:

During berthing, it is strictly forbidden for ship’s to test gmdss equipment. It is assumed that the gmdss watch is switched off, mf/hf off, ais/vhf 1 & vhf 2 on low power, both radars on stand by, main aerials isolated prior to enter the harbour with this noticed also in gmdss logbook. The only equipment remain on is inmarsat equipment but no any gmdss test are allowed to be done at berth. The reason to swirch off radio/gmdss equipment when alongside is for tankers vessels at terminal to avoid unnecessary radiation/ or sparks which could lead to accidents such as fire, explosion and so on, and for all types of vessels to avoid jam/interference. we can define a port or harbour a place with high density of vessels, each one carrying its own radio installation, which, if in use all in same time and in such a restricted place, will produce congestion in radio system, not in maritime mobile service only, but for aeronautical, army, police, medical, security, government and other communication systems which use same band of communication. before gmdss system come into force in february 1999, ship’s transmitters where sealed by port authorities (radio inspector) from arrival to departure, even in anchorage hf transmitter was forbiiden to be used, only mf communication with adjacent mf coast station were allowed. on the other hand, gmdss system is designed mostly for distress and safety at sea, in port we don’t need to use it. in case of emergency in port we have other option. So, if you need to test gmdss equipment daily, weekly or monthly, you can do it before arrival or with first opportunity after departure, but not in harbour. in harbour you are dealing with loading/discharging operation as deck officer. For routine/commercial communication ship’s captain have enough email system which cover all his need for communication. and don’t forgeth, the ais is not gmdss equipment. it can be tested, but is not compulsory as part of gmdss requirements. it can be tested only as bridge equipment as required by vetting or psc inspection.
More information regarding gmdss testing daily/weekly/monthly you can find in company policy, gmdss equipment manuals and instuctions, gmdss manual, admirality list of radio signals vol 5 (gmdss) and ITU radio regulations. good luck !

]]>
By: IMTIAZ https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships/#comment-4732924 Tue, 08 Oct 2019 13:39:57 +0000 https://www.marineinsight.com/?p=164563#comment-4732924 VERY GOOD ARTICLE AND GIVES EXPLANATION OF ALL THE GMDSS TESTS IN DETAIL.
VERY INFORMATIVE
PLEASE CAN YOU GIVE IN DETAILS WHAT ENTRIES ARE ENTERED AS DAILY / WEEKLY / AND MONTHLY TESTS IN GMDSS LOG BOOK. THANKS

]]>
By: Anish https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships/#comment-4704297 Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:15:15 +0000 https://www.marineinsight.com/?p=164563#comment-4704297 In reply to Regele Pirat.

@Regele: ????????

]]>
By: Regele Pirat https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships/#comment-4703863 Sun, 23 Jun 2019 19:05:21 +0000 https://www.marineinsight.com/?p=164563#comment-4703863 Very good! I learned a lot! Muie PSD !

]]>
By: Anish https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships/#comment-4702597 Sun, 16 Jun 2019 07:15:36 +0000 https://www.marineinsight.com/?p=164563#comment-4702597 In reply to Kaung Myat San.

@Kaung: Glad the information is useful. Best of luck. ????????

]]>
By: Kaung Myat San https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships/#comment-4701916 Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:39:40 +0000 https://www.marineinsight.com/?p=164563#comment-4701916 Thank you for such precious information. I really needed this for my interview for promotion to third officer.

]]>
By: Allen Louis https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships/#comment-3692283 Fri, 26 Apr 2019 06:07:05 +0000 https://www.marineinsight.com/?p=164563#comment-3692283 Hi,
As per the radio regulation, its said that MF/DSC test call hard copy is not required, if there is a capacity for the DSC modem to store the transmitted and received logs . But can anyone help me the IMO document of this mentioning, the non requirement of the MF/ DSC printer.

]]>
By: Rakesh https://www.marineinsight.com/marine-navigation/gmdss-equipment-tests-on-ships/#comment-2673750 Sun, 20 Jan 2019 00:36:46 +0000 https://www.marineinsight.com/?p=164563#comment-2673750 Pls suggest when doing PV test from sat c the results are coming with different utc time

]]>